Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mammographic artifacts on full-field digital mammography

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This study investigates the incidence of full-field digital mammographic (FFDM) artifacts with three systems at two institutions and compares the artifacts between two detector types and two grid types. A total of 4,440 direct and 4,142 indirect FFDM images were reviewed by two radiologists, and artifacts were classified as patient related, hardware related, and software processing. The overall incidence of FFDM artifacts was 3.4 % (292/8,582). Patient related artifacts (motion artifacts and skin line artifacts) were the most commonly detected types (1.7 %). Underexposure among hardware related artifacts and high-density artifacts among software processing artifacts also were common (0.7 and 0.5 %, respectively). These artifacts, specific to digital mammography, were more common with the direct detector type and the crossed air grid type than with the indirect type and linear grid type (p < 0.05). The most common mammographic artifacts on FFDM were patient related, which might be controlled by the instruction of a patient and technologist. Underexposure and high-density artifacts were more common with direct detector and crossed air type of grid.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)231-236
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
    Volume27
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 2014

    Keywords

    • Artifacts
    • Breast
    • Health care
    • Image quality
    • Mammography
    • Quality assurance
    • Quality control
    • Radiography

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mammographic artifacts on full-field digital mammography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this