Microbiome alterations in women with pelvic organ prolapse and after anatomical restorative interventions

Myungshin Kim, Seungok Lee, Hoon Seok Kim, Mi Yeon Kwon, Jaeeun Yoo, Min Jeong Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a benign gynecological disease in which the pelvic organ descends into the vagina and causes voiding, and defecatory dysfunction, mainly occurs in older women. This study aimed to investigate the vaginal microbiome of POP and associated changes after anatomical restorative pessary or reconstructive pelvic operation. We analyzed the vaginal microbiome using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and compared the results among patient groups with POP, pessary, and postoperation. We also measured 10 inflammation-related cytokines in vaginal swab samples using multiplex immunoassay. In pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal community status type IV was the most prevalent, which showed a low abundance of Lactobacillus with increased diversity and abundance of anaerobic species. The alpha diversity of species richness was highest in the POP group. The beta diversity distance differed significantly between the three groups (p = 0.001). While human intestinal taxa-associated bacteria were reduced after pessary or operation, vaginitis-associated bacterial composition was altered but vaginal microbiome homeostasis was not improved. IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-1β, IL-4 and TNF-α levels increased in the pessary group. Therefore, in addition to anatomical restorative treatment, supplementary treatment focusing on the recovery of the vaginal microbiome may be needed to maintain the health of gynecological organs in old age.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17547
JournalScientific Reports
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer Nature Limited.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microbiome alterations in women with pelvic organ prolapse and after anatomical restorative interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this