Morphologic variations of the superior intercostal vein: An anatomical study with clinical applications

Hong Fu Liu, Yan Lian Xiong, In Beom Kim, Hyung Sun Won, Chang Zhu Jin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed to validate and compare the anatomical variations of the superior intercostal veins, focusing on their origin, course, anastomoses, and destination. In addition, the results were compared with findings from other relevant studies. Fifty Korean and 16 Chinese adult cadavers were dissected for this study. The superior intercostal veins were dissected and measured. In our study of 66 specimens, the right superior intercostal vein was observed in 92.3% of cases, while the left superior intercostal vein was observed in 50%. The right superior intercostal vein was subdivided into six types based on its composition, which mainly drained the second and third right posterior intercostal veins. Similarly, the left superior intercostal vein was subdivided into eight types, primarily involving the second to fourth left posterior intercostal veins. This detailed anatomical study successfully identified and classified the various morphologic types of the superior intercostal vein and reviewed the clinical significance of this vein. The findings of this study can offer valuable anatomical evidence to physicians, aiding in their understanding and utilization of the superior intercostal vein.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-619
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.

Keywords

  • accessory hemi
  • aortic nipple
  • azygos vein
  • azygos vein
  • complications
  • superior intercostal vein

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Morphologic variations of the superior intercostal vein: An anatomical study with clinical applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this