Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multicenter evaluation of the PASS score as a negative predictive tool and the impact of inter-observer variability in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma risk stratification

  • Sungyeon Jung
  • , Hye Ri Shin
  • , Su Jin Shin
  • , Hee Young Na
  • , Soon Won Hong
  • , So Yeon Park
  • , Chan Kwon Jung
  • , Kyeong Cheon Jung
  • , Young Lyun Oh
  • , Jae Kyung Won
  • Seoul National University
  • Yonsei University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal Gland Scaled Score (PASS) is widely used for risk stratification in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL), but its clinical utility is limited by inter-observer variability of its parameters and inconsistent predictive performance. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 1,518 patients with PPGL from five tertiary referral centers in Korea. Prognostic utility of PASS system was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Inter-observer variability was inferred by comparing area under the ROC curve (AUCs) across institutions. Simplified PASS systems were developed based on multivariable analysis of key histopathological parameters. Results: The PASS system was a significant predictor of adverse events and recurrence-free survival. Although the PASS system demonstrated only modest discriminative ability (AUC, 0.673), it showed a high negative predictive value (NPV, 0.885), supporting its usefulness as a screening tool for benign behavior. However, there was significant inter-institutional variability in PASS performance (AUC; range, 0.513 to 0.727; p < .05). The 3-factor Simple PASS, which incorporates necrosis, spindling, and mitotic figures, exhibited less inter-observer variation. The 4-factor Simple PASS, which adds vascular invasion to the 3-factor model, also showed reduced inter-observer variability and improved AUC and NPV compared to the original PASS system. Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort, the PASS system demonstrated high NPV and screening potential, but significant inter-observer variability remains a challenge. Simplification of the PASS system and enhanced pathologist training may improve reproducibility and clinical utility in PPGL risk stratification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-213
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

  • Neoplasm grading
  • Observer variation
  • Paraganglioma
  • Pheochromocytoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter evaluation of the PASS score as a negative predictive tool and the impact of inter-observer variability in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma risk stratification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this