No thermal tool using methods in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: No cautery, no drill, no illuminator, no more tears

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) without thermal tools such as cautery, drill and illuminator. The study is a retrospective analysis of patients in a tertiary care unit for oculoplastic surgery. The participants enrolled into the study are a retrospective series of 127 consecutive endonasal DCRs performed between January 2008 and March 2011. The surgical procedure in this conventional endoscopic transnasal DCR involved a manual osteotomy of the frontal process of the maxilla and removal of the lacrimal bone by punch without illuminator, cauterization and drill. We evaluated the result of the manual Endo-DCR technique without cauterization or drilling-assisted technique. Data of 127 eyes were reviewed. Full success was achieved in 90.5 % (115/127) of manual Endo-DCR technique with an average follow-up period of 6 months. Our study appears to show favorable results compared to other previously published outcomes including Endo-DCR surgery with thermal equipments. No thermal tool methods in endonasal DCR can achieve a good surgical success rate. Therefore, the newest tools, cauterization, drilling or illumination, are generally not necessary for endoscopic dacrycystorhinostomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2677-2682
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume270
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Keywords

  • Drill
  • Electrocautery
  • Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
  • Laser
  • Success rate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No thermal tool using methods in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: No cautery, no drill, no illuminator, no more tears'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this