Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

PAC-Net: Pairwise aesthetic comparison network for image aesthetic assessment

  • Korea University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Image aesthetic assessment is important for finding well taken and appealing photographs but is challenging due to the ambiguity and subjectivity of aesthetic criteria. We develop the pairwise aesthetic comparison network (PAC-Net), which consists of two parts: aesthetic feature extraction and pairwise feature comparison. To alleviate the ambiguity and subjectivity, we train PAC-Net to learn the relative aesthetic ranks of two images by employing a novel loss function, called aesthetic-adaptive cross entropy loss. Then, we develop simple schemes for using PAC-Net in the tasks of aesthetic ranking and aesthetic classification, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that PAC-Net achieves the state-of-the-art performances in both the ranking and classification applications.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2018 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2018 - Proceedings
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages2491-2495
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781479970612
DOIs
StatePublished - 29 Aug 2018
Event25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2018 - Athens, Greece
Duration: 7 Oct 201810 Oct 2018

Publication series

NameProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP
ISSN (Print)1522-4880

Conference

Conference25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2018
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityAthens
Period7/10/1810/10/18

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.

Keywords

  • Aesthetic ranking
  • And pairwise comparison
  • Convolutional neural networks
  • Image aesthetic assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PAC-Net: Pairwise aesthetic comparison network for image aesthetic assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this