Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the result of electrocauterization and curettage, which can be done with basic instruments. Patients with ingrown nail were randomized to 2 groups. In the first group, nail matrix was removed by curettage, and the second group, nail matrix was removed by electrocautery. A total of 61 patients were enrolled; 32 patients were operated by curettage, and 29 patients were operated by electrocautery. Wound infections, as early complication, were found in 15.6% (5/32) of the curettage group, 10.3% (3/29) of the electrocautery group patients each (P =.710). Nonrecurrence was observed in 93.8% (30/32) and 86.2% (25/29) of the curettage and electrocautery groups, respectively, (lower limit of 1-sided 90% confidence interval = -2.3% > -15% [noninferiority margin]). To remove nail matrix, the curettage is effective as well as the electrocauterization. Further study is required to determine the differences between the procedures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192-195 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 21 Jun 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2014.
Keywords
- curettage
- electrocauterization
- ingrown nails
- treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Partial removal of nail matrix in the treatment of ingrown nails: Prospective randomized control study between curettage and electrocauterization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver