TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase III HEAT study adding lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin to radiofrequency ablation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma lesions
AU - Tak, Won Young
AU - Lin, Shi Ming
AU - Wang, Yijun
AU - Zheng, Jiasheng
AU - Vecchione, Aldo
AU - Park, Soo Young
AU - Chen, Min Hua
AU - Wong, Stephen
AU - Xu, Ruocai
AU - Peng, Cheng Yuan
AU - Chiou, Yi You
AU - Huang, Guan Tarn
AU - Cai, Jianqiang
AU - Abdullah, Basri Johan Jeet
AU - Lee, June Sung
AU - Lee, Jae Young
AU - Choi, Jong Young
AU - Gopez-Cervantes, Julieta
AU - Sherman, Morris
AU - Finn, Richard S.
AU - Omata, Masao
AU - O'Neal, Michael
AU - Makris, Lukas
AU - Borys, Nicholas
AU - Poon, Ronnie
AU - Lencioni, Riccardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 AACR.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Purpose: Lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD) consists of doxorubicin contained within a heat-sensitive liposome. When heated to ≥40°C, LTLD locally releases a high concentration of doxorubicin. We aimed to determine whether adding LTLD improves the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions with a maximum diameter (d max ) of 3 to 7 cm. Experimental Design: The HEAT Study was a randomized, double-blind, dummy-controlled trial of RFA ± LTLD. The 701 enrolled patients had to have ≤4 unresectable HCC lesions, at least one of which had a d max of 3 to 7 cm. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and a key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Post hoc subset analyses investigated whether RFA duration was associated with efficacy. Results: The primary endpoint was not met; in intention-totreat analysis, the PFS HR of RFA + LTLD versus RFA alone was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.18; P = 0.71], and the OS HR ratio was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76-1.20; P = 0.67). Among 285 patients with a solitary HCC lesion who received ≥45 minutes RFA dwell time, the OS HR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41-0.96; P < 0.05) in favor of combination therapy. RFA + LTLD had reversible myelosuppression similar to free doxorubicin. Conclusions: Adding LTLD to RFA was safe but did not increase PFS or OS in the overall study population. However, consistent with LTLD's heat-based mechanism of action, subgroup analysis suggested that RFA + LTLD efficacy is improved when RFA dwell time for a solitary lesion ≥45 minutes.
AB - Purpose: Lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD) consists of doxorubicin contained within a heat-sensitive liposome. When heated to ≥40°C, LTLD locally releases a high concentration of doxorubicin. We aimed to determine whether adding LTLD improves the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions with a maximum diameter (d max ) of 3 to 7 cm. Experimental Design: The HEAT Study was a randomized, double-blind, dummy-controlled trial of RFA ± LTLD. The 701 enrolled patients had to have ≤4 unresectable HCC lesions, at least one of which had a d max of 3 to 7 cm. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and a key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Post hoc subset analyses investigated whether RFA duration was associated with efficacy. Results: The primary endpoint was not met; in intention-totreat analysis, the PFS HR of RFA + LTLD versus RFA alone was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.18; P = 0.71], and the OS HR ratio was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76-1.20; P = 0.67). Among 285 patients with a solitary HCC lesion who received ≥45 minutes RFA dwell time, the OS HR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41-0.96; P < 0.05) in favor of combination therapy. RFA + LTLD had reversible myelosuppression similar to free doxorubicin. Conclusions: Adding LTLD to RFA was safe but did not increase PFS or OS in the overall study population. However, consistent with LTLD's heat-based mechanism of action, subgroup analysis suggested that RFA + LTLD efficacy is improved when RFA dwell time for a solitary lesion ≥45 minutes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040085476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2433
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2433
M3 - Article
C2 - 29018051
AN - SCOPUS:85040085476
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 24
SP - 73
EP - 83
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 1
ER -