TY - JOUR
T1 - Progression of long head of the biceps brachii tendon abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging after rotator cuff repair
AU - Lee, Seung Eun
AU - Jung, Joon Yong
AU - Lee, So Yeon
AU - Park, Hyerim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Objectives To correlate the deterioration of preserved long head of biceps tendon (LHB) after rotator cuff repair with preoperative and postoperative MRI factors. Methods Total of 209 shoulder joints (F:M = 145:64; mean age 57.4 years) which underwent rotator cuff repair and at least two postoperative MRI scans over 10 months after surgery were included. LHB integrity was graded with a five point severity scale. LHB deterioration was defined by increased composite score of integrity and extent score between the preoperative and second postoperative MRI. For preoperative and postoperative MRI factors, size and location of superior cuff -supraspinatus and infraspinatus- and subscapularis tears, fatty degeneration of rotator cuff, preoperative LHB status, subluxation of LHB, superior labral tear, acromion type, repaired rotator cuff status, postoperative capsulitis and acromioplasty state were assessed. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between LHB deterioration and aforementioned factors. Same analysis was conducted for 62 shoulder joints with a long-term follow-up MRI. Results Of the 209 shoulders, 49.3% (n = 103) showed LHB deterioration on short-term follow-up MRI. In long-term follow-up subgroup, 32 LHBs were further deteriorated. In multivariate analysis, fatty degeneration of superior cuff showed significant association with LHB deterioration in both short-term (p = .04, p = .007) and long-term subgroups (p = .004, p = .005) among preoperative and postoperative factors, respectively. Conclusions Degree of fatty degeneration in superior cuff is associated with LHB deterioration on postoperative MRI. Advances in knowledge Our results support that tenotomy or tenodesis of LHB should be considered during rotator cuff repair, especially in patients with advanced fatty degeneration of rotator cuff.
AB - Objectives To correlate the deterioration of preserved long head of biceps tendon (LHB) after rotator cuff repair with preoperative and postoperative MRI factors. Methods Total of 209 shoulder joints (F:M = 145:64; mean age 57.4 years) which underwent rotator cuff repair and at least two postoperative MRI scans over 10 months after surgery were included. LHB integrity was graded with a five point severity scale. LHB deterioration was defined by increased composite score of integrity and extent score between the preoperative and second postoperative MRI. For preoperative and postoperative MRI factors, size and location of superior cuff -supraspinatus and infraspinatus- and subscapularis tears, fatty degeneration of rotator cuff, preoperative LHB status, subluxation of LHB, superior labral tear, acromion type, repaired rotator cuff status, postoperative capsulitis and acromioplasty state were assessed. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between LHB deterioration and aforementioned factors. Same analysis was conducted for 62 shoulder joints with a long-term follow-up MRI. Results Of the 209 shoulders, 49.3% (n = 103) showed LHB deterioration on short-term follow-up MRI. In long-term follow-up subgroup, 32 LHBs were further deteriorated. In multivariate analysis, fatty degeneration of superior cuff showed significant association with LHB deterioration in both short-term (p = .04, p = .007) and long-term subgroups (p = .004, p = .005) among preoperative and postoperative factors, respectively. Conclusions Degree of fatty degeneration in superior cuff is associated with LHB deterioration on postoperative MRI. Advances in knowledge Our results support that tenotomy or tenodesis of LHB should be considered during rotator cuff repair, especially in patients with advanced fatty degeneration of rotator cuff.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85112127061
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20210366
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20210366
M3 - Article
C2 - 34233512
AN - SCOPUS:85112127061
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 94
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1124
M1 - 20210366
ER -