Abstract
Aim:The efficiency and safety of EZ-close Port-Site Closure System were investigated in comparison with those of the Carter-Thomason CloseSure System (CT) device.Methods:This was a prospective randomized control study. The primary outcome was the time taken to complete the closure of the port site using either the EZ or CT. The suture time (mean±SD) for the EZ group was significantly less than that of the CT group (36.8±10.1 s for the EZ group vs. 48.9±21.5 s for the CT group, P=0.004). There was no need for additional instruments in the EZ group, but in 84.6% of the patients in the CT group, a grasper was required to hold the tie (P<0.05). There was no difference in the complication rates between the 2 groups.Conclusions:The EZ device showed an improved efficiency and similar safety compared with that of the CT device. Its main advantage lied in enabling the surgeon to be totally self-sufficient for the whole port-site closing procedure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 335-338 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- complications
- laparoscopy
- port-site closure device