Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Radiographic progression in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: A systemic literature review of trials performed by industry

  • Dr. I. Cantacuzino Institute
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives To summarise radiographic data in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) as part of the radiographic inhibition claim of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods A systemic literature review was performed using the Medline database from 1994 to February 2020. The results were grouped based on the scoring methods (Sharp, Genant modification, van der Heijde modification) and RA patient populations. Results One hundred sixty-eight publications were selected. After detailed assessment, 52 RCTs (7 methotrexate (MTX)-naive, 23 MTX inadequate response (IR), 9 DMARDs IR and 3 tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) IR studies) were finally included. Information on patient population, scoring method used, reader reliability, statistical analyses and detailed radiographic data on baseline and change scores over multiple follow-up periods are presented. Conclusion The data gathered in this review serve as a repository for the design of future trials with radiographic damage as an outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere001277
JournalRMD Open
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • Arthritis
  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Inflammation
  • Outcomes research
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Spondyloarthritis
  • Synovitis
  • Systemic Sclerosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiographic progression in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: A systemic literature review of trials performed by industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this