TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiomics may increase the prognostic value for survival in glioblastoma patients when combined with conventional clinical and genetic prognostic models
AU - Choi, Yangsean
AU - Nam, Yoonho
AU - Jang, Jinhee
AU - Shin, Na Young
AU - Lee, Youn Soo
AU - Ahn, Kook Jin
AU - Kim, Bum soo
AU - Park, Jae Sung
AU - Jeon, Sin soo
AU - Hong, Yong Gil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the additional prognostic value of multiparametric MR-based radiomics in patients with glioblastoma when combined with conventional clinical and genetic prognostic factors. Methods: In this single-center study, patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between October 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively screened and grouped into training and test sets with a 7:3 distribution. Segmentations of glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI were performed automatically via a convolutional-neural network. Prognostic factors in the clinical model included age, sex, type of surgery/post-operative treatment, and tumor location; those in the genetic model included statuses of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 mutation and O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter methylation. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Integrated time-dependent area under the curve (iAUC) for survival was calculated and compared between prognostic models via the bootstrapping method (performances were validated with prediction error curves). Results: Overall, 120 patients were included (training set, 85; test set, 35). The mean OS and PFS were 25.5 and 18.6 months, respectively. The prognostic performances of multivariate models improved when radiomics was added to the clinical model (iAUC: OS, 0.62 to 0.73; PFS, 0.58 to 0.66), genetic model (iAUC: OS, 0.59 to 0.67; PFS, 0.59 to 0.65), and combined model (iAUC: OS, 0.65 to 0.73; PFS, 0.62 to 0.67). In the test set, the combined model (clinical, genetic, and radiomics) demonstrated robust validation for risk prediction of OS and PFS. Conclusions: Radiomics increased the prognostic value when combined with conventional clinical and genetic prognostic models for OS and PFS in glioblastoma patients. Key Points: • CNN-based automatic segmentation of glioblastoma on multiparametric MRI was useful in extracting radiomic features. • Patients with glioblastoma with high-risk radiomics scores had poor overall survival (hazards ratio 8.33, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (hazards ratio 3.76, p < 0.001). • MR-based radiomics improved the survival prediction when combined with clinical and genetic factors (overall and progression-free survival iAUC from 0.65 to 0.73 and 0.62 to 0.67, respectively; both p < 0.001).
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the additional prognostic value of multiparametric MR-based radiomics in patients with glioblastoma when combined with conventional clinical and genetic prognostic factors. Methods: In this single-center study, patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between October 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively screened and grouped into training and test sets with a 7:3 distribution. Segmentations of glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI were performed automatically via a convolutional-neural network. Prognostic factors in the clinical model included age, sex, type of surgery/post-operative treatment, and tumor location; those in the genetic model included statuses of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 mutation and O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter methylation. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Integrated time-dependent area under the curve (iAUC) for survival was calculated and compared between prognostic models via the bootstrapping method (performances were validated with prediction error curves). Results: Overall, 120 patients were included (training set, 85; test set, 35). The mean OS and PFS were 25.5 and 18.6 months, respectively. The prognostic performances of multivariate models improved when radiomics was added to the clinical model (iAUC: OS, 0.62 to 0.73; PFS, 0.58 to 0.66), genetic model (iAUC: OS, 0.59 to 0.67; PFS, 0.59 to 0.65), and combined model (iAUC: OS, 0.65 to 0.73; PFS, 0.62 to 0.67). In the test set, the combined model (clinical, genetic, and radiomics) demonstrated robust validation for risk prediction of OS and PFS. Conclusions: Radiomics increased the prognostic value when combined with conventional clinical and genetic prognostic models for OS and PFS in glioblastoma patients. Key Points: • CNN-based automatic segmentation of glioblastoma on multiparametric MRI was useful in extracting radiomic features. • Patients with glioblastoma with high-risk radiomics scores had poor overall survival (hazards ratio 8.33, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (hazards ratio 3.76, p < 0.001). • MR-based radiomics improved the survival prediction when combined with clinical and genetic factors (overall and progression-free survival iAUC from 0.65 to 0.73 and 0.62 to 0.67, respectively; both p < 0.001).
KW - Glioblastoma
KW - Isocitrate dehydrogenase
KW - Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Prognosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091804677
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-020-07335-1
DO - 10.1007/s00330-020-07335-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 33006658
AN - SCOPUS:85091804677
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 31
SP - 2084
EP - 2093
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 4
ER -