Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study

  • Soo In Choi
  • , Jong Wook Kim
  • , Kee Wook Jung
  • , Boram Cha
  • , Ga Hee Kim
  • , Myeongsook Seo
  • , Han Hee Lee
  • , Ju Yup Lee
  • , Seung Young Kim
  • , Seon Young Park
  • , Yu Kyung Cho
  • , Chong Il Sohn
  • , Suck Chei Choi
  • National Medical Center
  • Inje University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Inha University
  • Yonsei University
  • Keimyung University
  • Korea University
  • Chonnam National University
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
  • Wonkwang University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/ Aims The Chicago classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0) proposes a standardized high-resolution manometry protocol for more sophisticated diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. We aim to investigate the real-world application of CC v4.0 through multi-institutional surveys in Asian countries. Methods We requested a total of 161 questionnaires from members of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association via Google Survey from March to June 2023. The questionnaire assessed CC v4.0 protocol compliance and diagnosis. Results Responses were received from 33 centers in 9 countries (18 in Korea, 5 in Japan, and 10 in others). Among these, anticholinergics were investigated in 14 centers (42.4%), and narcotic drugs in 16 centers (48.5%). Eight centers (24.2%) fully adhered to CC v4.0 protocol for single wet swallows and provocation tests. Nine centers (27.3%) had an adaptation period < 60 seconds, 13 centers (39.4%) had < 3 breath counts, and 15 centers (45.5%) had swallowing intervals < 30 seconds (42.4% had 10-29 seconds and 3% had < 10 seconds). Twenty-four centers (72.7%) started the examination in a supine position and 13 centers (39.4%) did not change their position. Among 27 centers (81.8%) applying provocation tests, all applied multiple rapid swallows, whereas rapid drink challenge was applied in 19 (57.6%). Timed barium esophagography and functional lumen imaging probe were available in 16 (48.5%) and 6 centers (18.2%), respectively. Conclusions We observed heterogeneity among centers in the application of CC v4.0 protocol. To increase inter-center reliability and minimize diagnostic ambiguity, efforts should continue toward the practical clinical application of standard protocols.(J

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-365
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Keywords

  • Esophageal motility disorders
  • Manometry
  • Practice patterns
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • physicians’

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this