Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Retrospective analysis of current guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in at-risk patients

  • So Hyun Park
  • , Young Sup Shim
  • , Bohyun Kim
  • , So Yeon Kim
  • , Yun Soo Kim
  • , Jimi Huh
  • , Ji Hyun Park
  • , Kyung Won Kim
  • , Seung Soo Lee
    • Gachon University
    • University of Ulsan
    • Ajou University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objective: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of the updated HCC guidelines using gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI. Methods: In this study, patients at risk of HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI following US/CT surveillance were retrospectively recruited from 3 centers. Three radiologists independently evaluated hepatic nodule imaging features relevant to the diagnostic criteria outlined in each guideline. Per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between guidelines using logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation. Inter-observer agreements on imaging features were determined using Fless κ statistics. Results: Altogether, 447 nodules (310 HCCs, 20 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 115 benign entities) measuring 1–3 cm from 386 patients were assessed. The KLCA-NCC and APASL guidelines showed the highest sensitivity (82.3–90.6%, p <.001) and accuracy (83.9–88.6%) among the five guidelines. The OPTN/UNOS guideline showed the highest specificity (94.9–97.1%), followed by the AASLD/LI-RADS, EASL, KLCA-NCC, and APASL guidelines, with significant difference only with the APASL guideline. The diagnostic performance of the updated AASLD/LI-RADS and EASL guidelines and of the KLCA-NCC and APASL guidelines was comparable (p >.05). Inter-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.73–0.87). Conclusions: For the diagnosis of HCC using gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI, the KLCA-NCC and APASL guidelines showed the highest sensitivity and accuracy. The OPTN/UNOS guideline showed the highest specificity. Acknowledging their relative strengths and weaknesses could help adapt the diagnostic criteria according to the clinical context. Key Points: • APASL and KLCA-NCC provided significantly the highest sensitivity and accuracy, followed by AASLD/LI-RADS and EASL in an endemic area for hepatitis B. • OPTN/UNOS showed the highest specificity, followed by AASLD/LI-RADS, EASL, KLCA-NCC, and APASL guidelines, with significant difference only with APASL. • Broadened definition of arterial hyperenhancement, washout, and the size of the lesion eligible to apply diagnostic criteria may improve the diagnostic performance for HCC in an endemic area for hepatitis B.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4751-4763
    Number of pages13
    JournalEuropean Radiology
    Volume31
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2021, European Society of Radiology.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Guideline
    • Hepatocellular carcinoma
    • Liver
    • Magnetic resonance imaging

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective analysis of current guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in at-risk patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this