Review of failed CT phantom image evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT accreditation program of the Korean institute for accreditation of medical image

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objective: The CT accreditation program was established in 2004 by the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image (KIAMI) to confirm that there was proper quality assurance of computed tomography (CT) images. We reviewed all the failed CT phantom image evaluations performed in 2005 and 2006. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 604 failed CT phantom image evaluations according to the type of evaluation, the size of the medical institution, the parameters of the phantom image testing and the manufacturing date of the CT scanners. Results: The failure rates were 10.5% and 21.6% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Spatial resolution was the most frequently failed parameter for the CT phantom image evaluations in both years (50.5% and 49%, respectively). The proportion of cases with artifacts increased in 2006 (from 4.5% to 37.8%). The failed cases in terms of image uniformity and the CT number of water decreased in 2006. The failure rate in general hospitals was lower than at other sites. In 2006, the proportion of CT scanners manufactured before 1995 decreased (from 12.9% to 9.3%). Conclusion: The continued progress in the CT accreditation program may achieve improved image quality and thereby improve the national health of.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)354-363
    Number of pages10
    JournalKorean Journal of Radiology
    Volume9
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 2008

    Keywords

    • Computed tomography (CT)
    • Image quality
    • Phantoms
    • Quality assurance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Review of failed CT phantom image evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT accreditation program of the Korean institute for accreditation of medical image'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this