Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of early high parenteral lipid supplementation in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine
  • The Catholic University of Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the effects of early initiation and achievement of a high dose of parenteral lipids (≥1.5 g/kg/day reached within the first 24 h of birth) on growth and adverse outcomes in preterm infants. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were utilized to search for publications for this meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials were eligible if data on growth or clinical outcome was available. The search returned nine studies. The mean proportion of postnatal weight loss (%) was lower (mean difference [MD]: −2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.69, −1.78), and the mean head circumference near the term equivalent age (cm) was higher in the early high lipid treatment group (MD: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.25, 1.09). There was a favorable association of early high lipid administration with the incidence of extrauterine growth restriction (relative risk [RR]: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.48). Generally, there were no differences in morbidities or adverse outcomes with early high lipid administration. Early initiation of parenteral lipids and high dose achieved within the first 24 h of life appear to be safe and endurable and offer benefits in terms of growth.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1535
JournalNutrients
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Adverse effect
  • Growth
  • Lipids
  • Preterm infants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and efficacy of early high parenteral lipid supplementation in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this