Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex- and phenotype-specific prognostic implications of body mass index in acute heart failure

  • Yoonsun Won
  • , Mi Seung Shin
  • , Eunji Kim
  • , Wook Jin Chung
  • , Eung Ju Kim
  • , Seongwoo Han
  • , Seong Mi Park
  • , Hyungseop Kim
  • , Ju Hee Lee
  • , Hyo Suk Ahn
  • , Hyun Jai Cho
  • , Seok Jae Hwang
  • , Jin Ok Jeong
  • , Dong Heon Yang
  • , Junho Hyun
  • , Jin Oh Choi
  • , Byung Su Yoo
  • , Seok Min Kang
  • , Dong Ju Choi
  • Gachon University
  • Korea University
  • Hallym University
  • Keimyung University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Seoul National University
  • Gyeongsang National University
  • Chungnam National University
  • Kyungpook National University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Yonsei University Mirae Campus
  • Yonsei University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine whether the prognostic implications of body mass index (BMI) differ according to heart failure (HF) phenotype and sex. Methods: From the Korean HF III registry (n = 7351), we analyzed 5271 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) with available data. BMI was categorized as low (<18.5 kg/m²), normal (18.5–24.9), or high (≥25.0) using cut-off values consistent with Asia-Pacific criteria. The primary outcome was a composite of 2-year all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. Kaplan–Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, including interaction terms for BMI, sex, and HF phenotype, were performed. Results: In HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), lower BMI was consistently associated with worse outcomes in both men and women. In contrast, in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), BMI was prognostic in women but not in men: survival differed by BMI category in Kaplan–Meier analyses for all subgroups except men with HFpEF. In multivariable analyses, higher BMI was independently associated with lower risk in women with HFrEF [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.96, P = .032], whereas lower BMI in women with HFpEF showed a borderline association with higher risk (HR 1.56, 95% CI 0.99–2.47, P = .057). Conclusion: The prognostic implications of BMI in AHF differ according to HF phenotype and sex. Lower BMI is a consistent adverse marker in HFrEF in both sexes and shows a borderline adverse association in women with HFpEF, whereas BMI is not prognostic in men with HFpEF. These findings highlight the importance of sex- and phenotype-specific interpretation of BMI in risk assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberxvag050
JournalESC heart failure
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Keywords

  • Acute heart failure
  • Body mass index
  • Heart failure phenotype
  • Registry
  • Sex differences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex- and phenotype-specific prognostic implications of body mass index in acute heart failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this