Sex as an important biological variable in biomedical research

Suk Kyeong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

185 Scopus citations

Abstract

Experimental results obtained from research using only one sex are sometimes extrapolated to both sexes without thorough justification. However, this might cause enormous economic loss and unintended fatalities. Between years 1997 and 2000, the US Food and Drug Administration suspended ten prescription drugs producing severe adverse effects on the market. Eight of the ten drugs caused greater health risks in women. Serious male biases in basic, preclinical, and clinical research were the main reason for the problem. This mini-review will describe why and how funding organizations such as the European Commission, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the US National Institutes of Health have tried to influence researchers to integrate sex/gender not only in clinical research, but also in basic and preclinical research. Editorial policies of prominent journals for sex-specific reporting will also be introduced, and some considerations in integrating sex as a biological variable will be pointed out. To produce precise and reproducible results applicable for both men and women, sex should be considered as an important biological variable from basic and preclinical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalBMB Reports
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the The Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

Keywords

  • Animal
  • Biological variable
  • Cell
  • Female
  • Funding
  • Gender
  • Journal
  • Male
  • Preclinical research
  • Sex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex as an important biological variable in biomedical research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this