Significance of incidental focal uptake in prostate on 18-fluoro-2- deoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT images

To evaluate the clinical significance of incidental focal prostate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake, we reviewed 18-F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans from 2003 to 2007 and selected cases with focal FDG uptake in prostate. Cases of known prostate cancer were excluded. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUV_max), site (central or peripheral) and pattern (discrete or ill-defined) of FDG uptake, calcification (present or absent) and prostate volume (<30 or ≥30 cc) were recorded. The PET/CT findings were correlated with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, imaging studies, clinical follow-up and biopsy. Of a total of 5119cases, 63 (1.2%) demonstrated focal FDG uptake in prostate. Eight cases were lost to follow-up. Among the 55 cases with follow-up, malignancy was confirmed by biopsy in 3 (5.4%). The three malignant cases had SUV_max values of 3.3, 3.6 and 2.3, and all were noted in the peripheral portion of prostate; two of these cases had a discrete FDG uptake pattern, none had calcification corresponding to the FDG uptake area and one had a prostatic volume greater than 30 cc. The mean SUV_max of 52 benign cases was 3.2±1.7 and focal FDG uptake was noted in the peripheral portion in 34 (65%), 20 (38%) cases showed a discrete FDG uptake pattern, 35 (67%) were accompanied by calcification and 32 (62%) had a prostatic volume greater than 30 cc. The majority of cases demonstrating focal FDG uptake in prostate were benign and no PET/CT finding could reliably differentiate benign from malignant lesions; however, when discrete focal FDG uptake without coincidental calcification is seen, particularly in the peripheral zone of the prostate, further clinical evaluation is recommended.