TY - JOUR
T1 - Staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric cancer
T2 - Is it also useful for the group which has an aggressive surgical strategy?
AU - Song, Kyo Young
AU - Kim, Jin Jo
AU - Kim, Seung Nam
AU - Park, Cho Hyun
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper was supported in part by the Catholic Cancer Center.
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - Background: Staging laparoscopy has been shown to be useful for increasing the accuracy of preoperative staging. However, controversy still exists regarding patient selection and subsequent treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the role of staging laparoscopy for a group that has a policy to perform aggressive surgery for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Twenty-four patients with clinical T3 or T4 gastric cancer expected to undergo curative resection, based on conventional preoperative diagnostic methods underwent staging laparoscopy. We examined the accuracy and the impact of staging laparoscopy on the further treatment options. Results: The mean running time for the staging laparoscopy was 40.7 min (range: 25-75 min), and one complication was noted (4.2%). In regard to the tumor depth, 11 of 24 (45.8%) cases had a discrepancy after staging laparoscopy. In addition, 15 of 24 patients (62.5%) were found to have unsuspected peritoneal metastases, and 8 patients (33.3%) were excluded from laparotomy. The remaining 16 patients (66.7%), including 9 patients with localized peritoneal metastases (P1), underwent resection. The diagnostic accuracy for T factor was 81.3% in 16 laparotomy cases and overall accuracy of P factor was 91.7%. Conclusions: Staging laparoscopy had a significant impact on decisions regarding the treatment plan in patients with advanced gastric cancer for a group that has an aggressive treatment strategy.
AB - Background: Staging laparoscopy has been shown to be useful for increasing the accuracy of preoperative staging. However, controversy still exists regarding patient selection and subsequent treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the role of staging laparoscopy for a group that has a policy to perform aggressive surgery for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Twenty-four patients with clinical T3 or T4 gastric cancer expected to undergo curative resection, based on conventional preoperative diagnostic methods underwent staging laparoscopy. We examined the accuracy and the impact of staging laparoscopy on the further treatment options. Results: The mean running time for the staging laparoscopy was 40.7 min (range: 25-75 min), and one complication was noted (4.2%). In regard to the tumor depth, 11 of 24 (45.8%) cases had a discrepancy after staging laparoscopy. In addition, 15 of 24 patients (62.5%) were found to have unsuspected peritoneal metastases, and 8 patients (33.3%) were excluded from laparotomy. The remaining 16 patients (66.7%), including 9 patients with localized peritoneal metastases (P1), underwent resection. The diagnostic accuracy for T factor was 81.3% in 16 laparotomy cases and overall accuracy of P factor was 91.7%. Conclusions: Staging laparoscopy had a significant impact on decisions regarding the treatment plan in patients with advanced gastric cancer for a group that has an aggressive treatment strategy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34447101639
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-007-9056-9
DO - 10.1007/s00268-007-9056-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 17464538
AN - SCOPUS:34447101639
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 31
SP - 1228
EP - 1233
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -