Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Teclistamab plus Daratumumab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

  • MajesTEC-3 Trial Investigators
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Calgary
  • Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse
  • Emory University
  • Peking University
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • The Institute of Cancer Research
  • University of Turin
  • Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba
  • Hôpital de Jolimont
  • Ontario Cancer Institute
  • Sichuan University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • University of Tübingen
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Korea University
  • Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli
  • University of Bologna
  • Hyogo Medical University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Isala Clinics
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Medical University of Gdańsk
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  • Ondokuz Mayis University
  • Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Stanford University
  • University of Navarra
  • Complutense University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Johnson & Johnson Management Limited
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a phase 1-2 trial, teclistamab, a bispecific antibody targeting CD3 on T-cell surfaces and B-cell maturation antigen on myeloma cells, showed durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 protein, has shown survival benefit in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with one to three previous lines of therapy to receive combination therapy with teclistamab-daratumumab or daratumumab combined with dexamethasone plus the investigator's choice of pomalidomide (DPd) or bortezomib (DVd) - the DPd or DVd group. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee. RESULTS: A total of 587 patients underwent randomization (291 to receive teclistamab-daratumumab and 296 to receive DPd or DVd). At a median of 34.5 months, progression-free survival was significantly longer with teclistamab-daratumumab than with DPd or DVd. The estimated 36-month progression-free survival was 83.4% in the teclistamab-daratumumab group and 29.7% in the DPd or DVd group (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.23; P<0.001). More patients in the teclistamab-daratumumab group than in the DPd or DVd group had a complete response or better (81.8% vs. 32.1%), an overall response (89.0% vs. 75.3%), and minimal residual disease negativity (10-5; 58.4% vs. 17.1%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Serious adverse events occurred in 70.7% of the patients in the teclistamab-daratumumab group and in 62.4% of those in the DPd or DVd group; death from adverse events occurred in 7.1% and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous lines of therapy, those in the teclistamab-daratumumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the DPd or DVd group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05083169.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-752
Number of pages14
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume394
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Teclistamab plus Daratumumab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this