TY - JOUR
T1 - The additional analgesic effects of transverse abdominis plane block in patients receiving low-dose intrathecal morphine for minimally invasive colorectal surgery
T2 - A randomized, single-blinded study
AU - Han, Seung Rim
AU - Lee, Chul Seung
AU - Bae, Jung Hoon
AU - Lee, Hyo Jin
AU - Yoon, Mi Ran
AU - Lee, Do Sang
AU - Lee, Yoon Suk
AU - Al-Sawat, Abdullah
AU - Shim, Jung Woo
AU - Hong, Sang Hyun
AU - Lee, In Kyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, the Korean Surgical Society
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Purpose: Intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) are effective pain control methods in abdominal surgery. However, there is still no gold standard for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether the analgesic effect could be increased when TAPB, which can further reduce wound somatic pain, was administered in low-dose morphine ITA patients. Methods: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were randomized into an ITA with TAPB group or an ITA group. Patients were evaluated for pain 0, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. The primary outcome was the total morphine milligram equivalents administered 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, ambulatory variables, inflammation markers, hospital stay duration, and complications within 48 hours after surgery. Results: A total of 64 patients were recruited, and 55 were compared. There was no significant difference in morphine use over the 24 hours after surgery in the 2 groups (ITA with TAPB, 15.3 mg vs. ITA, 10.2 mg; P = 0.270). Also, there was no significant difference in pain scores. In both groups, the average pain score at 24 and 48 hours was 2 points or less, showing effective pain control. Conclusion: ITA for pain control in patients with colorectal surgery is an effective pain method, and additional TAPB was not effective.
AB - Purpose: Intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) are effective pain control methods in abdominal surgery. However, there is still no gold standard for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether the analgesic effect could be increased when TAPB, which can further reduce wound somatic pain, was administered in low-dose morphine ITA patients. Methods: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were randomized into an ITA with TAPB group or an ITA group. Patients were evaluated for pain 0, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. The primary outcome was the total morphine milligram equivalents administered 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, ambulatory variables, inflammation markers, hospital stay duration, and complications within 48 hours after surgery. Results: A total of 64 patients were recruited, and 55 were compared. There was no significant difference in morphine use over the 24 hours after surgery in the 2 groups (ITA with TAPB, 15.3 mg vs. ITA, 10.2 mg; P = 0.270). Also, there was no significant difference in pain scores. In both groups, the average pain score at 24 and 48 hours was 2 points or less, showing effective pain control. Conclusion: ITA for pain control in patients with colorectal surgery is an effective pain method, and additional TAPB was not effective.
KW - Colorectal surgery
KW - Enhanced recovery after surgery
KW - Intrathecal analgesia
KW - Transverse abdominis plane block
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85117035773
U2 - 10.4174/astr.2021.101.4.221
DO - 10.4174/astr.2021.101.4.221
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117035773
SN - 2288-6575
VL - 101
SP - 221
EP - 230
JO - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
JF - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
IS - 4
ER -