TY - JOUR
T1 - The Association of Subspecialty and Sex with Industry Payments to Internal Medicine Physicians Who Recently Completed Training
AU - Park, Yong Hyun
AU - O’Rourke, Paul
AU - Gabrielson, Andrew
AU - Hogan, Sean O.
AU - Holmboe, Eric
AU - Jing, Yuezhou
AU - Yamazaki, Kenji
AU - Trock, Bruce J.
AU - Han, Misop
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Background: Financial relationships with drug and medical device companies may impact quality of care and academic research. However, little is known when and how these financial relationships develop among newly independent physicians who recently completed from residency or fellowship programs in internal medicine (IM). Objective: To compare patterns of industry payments among IM graduates. Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study. Subjects: IM graduates from residency or fellowship programs between January 2015 and December 2019. Main Measures: We analyzed Open Payments reports made between July 2015 and June 2021 to recent graduates of U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency and fellowship programs in IM. The primary outcome was general payments accepted by these physicians, stratified by procedural (i.e., critical care medicine/pulmonary medicine, cardiac/cardiovascular disease, and gastroenterology) and non-procedural (i.e., infectious disease, general internal medicine, and other specialties) subspecialties. The secondary outcomes included general payments stratified by sex and age at residency or fellowship training completion. Key Results: There were 41,669 IM physicians with a median age of 33.0 years. In the first 3 years after completion, the proportion of physicians accepting any general payments was 72.6%, 91.9%, and 86.8% in Critical Care Medicine/Pulmonary Medicine, Cardiac/Cardiovascular Disease, and Gastroenterology, compared to 56.1%, 52.6%, and 52.3% in Infectious Disease, General Internal Medicine, and Other Specialties (p<0.0001). After adjusting for confounding variables, the procedural group showed an increased hazard ratio (HR) for accepting any general payments and at least $5000 of general payments compared to the non-procedural group. The HRs of accepting any general payments in the procedural subspecialty were 2.26 (95% CI, 2.11–2.42) and 2.83 (95% CI, 2.70–2.97) in female and male physicians, respectively (p-value < 0.0001). Conclusion: Industry financial relationships among newly independent physicians in IM exist immediately after completion of training and are influenced by subspecialty, sex, and age.
AB - Background: Financial relationships with drug and medical device companies may impact quality of care and academic research. However, little is known when and how these financial relationships develop among newly independent physicians who recently completed from residency or fellowship programs in internal medicine (IM). Objective: To compare patterns of industry payments among IM graduates. Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study. Subjects: IM graduates from residency or fellowship programs between January 2015 and December 2019. Main Measures: We analyzed Open Payments reports made between July 2015 and June 2021 to recent graduates of U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency and fellowship programs in IM. The primary outcome was general payments accepted by these physicians, stratified by procedural (i.e., critical care medicine/pulmonary medicine, cardiac/cardiovascular disease, and gastroenterology) and non-procedural (i.e., infectious disease, general internal medicine, and other specialties) subspecialties. The secondary outcomes included general payments stratified by sex and age at residency or fellowship training completion. Key Results: There were 41,669 IM physicians with a median age of 33.0 years. In the first 3 years after completion, the proportion of physicians accepting any general payments was 72.6%, 91.9%, and 86.8% in Critical Care Medicine/Pulmonary Medicine, Cardiac/Cardiovascular Disease, and Gastroenterology, compared to 56.1%, 52.6%, and 52.3% in Infectious Disease, General Internal Medicine, and Other Specialties (p<0.0001). After adjusting for confounding variables, the procedural group showed an increased hazard ratio (HR) for accepting any general payments and at least $5000 of general payments compared to the non-procedural group. The HRs of accepting any general payments in the procedural subspecialty were 2.26 (95% CI, 2.11–2.42) and 2.83 (95% CI, 2.70–2.97) in female and male physicians, respectively (p-value < 0.0001). Conclusion: Industry financial relationships among newly independent physicians in IM exist immediately after completion of training and are influenced by subspecialty, sex, and age.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166931019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-023-08351-9
DO - 10.1007/s11606-023-08351-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 37550442
AN - SCOPUS:85166931019
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 39
SP - 45
EP - 51
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 1
ER -