The clinical performance of human papillomavirus genotyping using PANArray HPV chip: Comparison to ThinPrep cytology alone and co-testing

Recently, a high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) detecting assay alone could be used as a first-line screening tool for cervical cancer, although the test system has been limited to the Cobas 4800 HPV test. However, the screening efficiency of the HPV chip, which is widely used in Eastern Asia because of the high prevalence of non16/18 HR-HPV genotypes, has not been well elucidated. After selecting 300 women who were co-tested using the PANArray HPV chip and the ThinPrep assay and had confirmed histological diagnoses, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the PANArray HPV test based on direct sequencing and clinical performance compared to the ThinPrep alone and co-testing. HR-HPVs were identified in 212 (70.7 %) patients by the PANArray HPV test. The results of the PANArray HPV test and direct sequencing for detecting HR-HPVs were in almost perfect agreement, consistent in 95.3 % of the cases (k = 0.89). HR-HPVs were more commonly detected by the PANArray HPV assay in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) or worse (p < 0.001, both) by cytological and histological examinations. The PANArray HPV test had higher sensitivity (91.7 %) than the ThinPrep (52.6 %) but co-testing increased the sensitivity for predicting HSIL or worse cervical lesions to 99.2 %. In conclusion, the PANArray HPV test accurately detected HR-HPVs determined by cytological and histological examinations to be HSIL or worse cervical lesions. The PANArray HPV assay alone was more sensitive than the ThinPrep alone for detecting HSIL or worse cervical lesions, however, co-testing enhanced the sensitivity. Co-testing is more useful for screening HSIL or worse lesions than use of either the ThinPrep or PANArray HPV genotyping alone.