The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries

Siravich Suvithayasiri, Young Jin Kim, Yanting Liu, Warayos Trathitephun, Akarawit Asawasaksakul, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Vit Kotheeranurak, Haroldo Chagas, Cristian Correa Valencia, Marcus Vinicius Serra, Facundo Van Isseldyk, Lung Hsing Lee, Chien Min Chen, Pramod Lokhande, Sang Min Park, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Kandarpkumar K. Patel, Jung Hoon Kim, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Panya LuksanapruksaSirichai Wilartratsami, Jin Sung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We aim to report the outcomes and feasibility of endoscopic spine surgery used to treat symptomatic spinal metastases patients. This is the most extensive series of spinal metastases patients who underwent endoscopic spine surgery. Methods: A worldwide collaborative network group of endoscopic spine surgeons, named ‘ESSSORG,’ was established. Patients diagnosed with spinal metastases who underwent endoscopic spine surgery from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All related patient data and clinical outcomes were gathered and analyzed before the surgery and the follow-time period of 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: A total of 29 patients from South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, Mexico, Brazil, Ar-gentina, Chile, and India, were included. The mean age was 59.59 years, and 11 of them were female. The total number of decompressed levels was 40. The technique was relatively equal (15 uniportal; 14 biportal). The average length of admission was 4.41 days. Of all patients with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale of D or lower before surgery, 62.06% reported having at least one recovery grade after the surgery. Almost all clinical outcomes parameters statistically significantly improved and maintained from 2 weeks to 6 months after the surgery. Few surgical-related complications (4 cases) were reported. Conclusion: Endoscopic spine surgery is a valid option for treating spinal metastases patients as it could yield comparable results to other minimally invasive spine surgery tech-niques. As the aim is to improve the quality of life, this procedure is valuable and holds val-ue in palliative oncologic spine surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)608-619
Number of pages12
JournalNeurospine
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.

Keywords

  • Endoscopic spine surgery
  • Minimally invasive spine surgery
  • Palliative surgery
  • Quality of life
  • Spinal metastases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this