The simplified edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) for antenatal depression: Is it a valid measure for pre-screening?

  • Sae Kyung Choi
  • , Jung Jin Kim
  • , Yong Gyu Park
  • , Hyun Sun Ko
  • , In Yang Park
  • , Jong Chul Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

The identification of antenatal depression is critical but poorly conducted. The aim of this study was to construct a simplified depression survey scale and to verify its efficacy as a pre-screening for antenatal depression. A total of 494 pregnant women in the third trimester of gestation who had received antenatal care at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from July 2009 to June 2010 were included. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) questionnaire was completed by them. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: 250 of training set and 244 of validation set. We designed a simplified questionnaire comprising two items of EPDS using the training set. We then validated its efficacy with the training set and reaffirmed the results with the validation set. The sum of item 5 (scare or panic) and item 8 (sadness or misery) explained 75.5% of the total score of the EPDS (AUC = 0.947). Using a score of 3 as a cut-off value of the simplified scale, sensitivity was 92.4% and specificity was 86.3%. The positive and negative predictive values were 56.2% and 98.4%, retrospectively. This study suggests that the simplified EPDS can be an efficient instrument to rule out depression during pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-46
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Antenatal depression
  • Depression
  • Edinburgh postnatal depression scale
  • Perinatal mental health
  • Screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The simplified edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) for antenatal depression: Is it a valid measure for pre-screening?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this