Ureter Injury as a Complication of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Hyeong Jin Lee, Jin Sung Kim, Kyeong Sik Ryu, Choon Keun Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Oblique lumbar interbody fusion is a commonly used surgical method of achieving lumbar interbody fusion. There have been some reports about complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion at the L2–L3 level. However, to our knowledge, there have been no reports about ureter injury during oblique lumbar interbody fusion. We report a case of ureter injury during oblique lumbar interbody fusion to share our experience. Case Description A 78-year-old male patient presented with a history of lower back pain and neurogenic intermittent claudication. He was diagnosed with spinal stenosis at L2–L3, L4–L5 level and spondylolisthesis at L4–L5 level. Symptoms were not improved after several months of medical treatments. Then, oblique lumbar interbody fusion was performed at L2–L3, L4–L5 level. During the surgery, anesthesiologist noticed hematuria. A retrourethrogram was performed immediately by urologist, and ureter injury was found. Ureteroureterostomy and double-J catheter insertion were performed. The patient was discharged 2 weeks after surgery without urologic or neurologic complications. At 2 months after surgery, an intravenous pyelogram was performed, which showed an intact ureter. Conclusions Our study shows that a low threshold of suspicion of ureter injury and careful manipulation of retroperitoneal fat can be helpful to prevent ureter injury during oblique lumbar interbody fusion at the upper level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)693.e7
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume102
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Complication
  • L2–L3
  • Oblique lumbar interbody fusion
  • Ureter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ureter Injury as a Complication of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this