Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity of the telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS) and modified TICS (TICSm) for mild cognitive imparment (MCI) and dementia screening

  • Eun Hyun Seo
  • , Dong Young Lee
  • , Shin Gyeom Kim
  • , Ki Woong Kim
  • , Do Hoon Kim
  • , Bong jo Kim
  • , Moon Doo Kim
  • , Seong Yoon Kim
  • , Young Hoon Kim
  • , Jeong Lan Kim
  • , Jee Wook Kim
  • , Seok Woo Moon
  • , Joon Hyuck Park
  • , Seung Ho Ryu
  • , Jong Choul Yoon
  • , Nam Jin Lee
  • , Chang Uk Lee
  • , Jin Hyeong Jhoo
  • , Ll Han Choo
  • , Jong Inn Woo
  • Seoul National University
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Hallym University
  • Gyeongsang National University
  • Jeju National University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Inje University
  • Chungnam National University
  • Konkuk University
  • Gyeonggi Provincial Hospital for the Elderly
  • Chonju Welfare Hospital for the Elderly
  • Kangwon National University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

115 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the TICS and modified TICS (TICSm) in Korean elderly population and to compare MCI and dementia screening ability between TICS and TICSm. TICS and TICSm were administered to 70 cognitively normal (CN), 75 MCI, and 85 dementia subjects, with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and other cognitive and functional measures. TICS and TICSm scores were highly correlated with other global cognitive and functional scores. The CN vs. dementia discrimination ability of both instruments was as excellent as that of MMSE (sensitivity/specificity at optimal cutoff: 87.1/90.1 for TICS; 88.2/90.0 for TICSm). Although their CN vs. MCI discrimination performances were comparable to that of MMSE, they were far from perfect (sensitivity/specificity: 69.3/68.6 for TICS; 73.3/67.1 for TICSm). There was no significant difference in dementia or MCI screening accuracy between TICS and TICSm. Both of them also showed high test-retest reliability. Our findings indicate that TICS and TICSm are reliable and as valid as MMSE in regard of screening cognitively impaired elderly. In terms of the comparison between TICSm and TICS, however, TICSm has little advantage over TICS for screening dementia and even MCI, in spite of longer administration time and more efforts required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e26-e30
JournalArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the Seoul National University Hospital (Grant No.: 04-2007-027 ) and a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfares & Family Affairs , Republic of Korea (Grant No.: A070001 ).

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Cognitive screening
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Modified telephone interview for cognitive status (TICSm)
  • Telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of the telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS) and modified TICS (TICSm) for mild cognitive imparment (MCI) and dementia screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this