Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why locking plates for the proximal humerus do not fit well

  • Hyungsuk Kim
  • , Yang Guk Chung
  • , Ji Seok Jang
  • , Yongdeok Kim
  • , Soo Bin Park
  • , Hyun Seok Song
  • The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: We compared the angle of the humerus and plate and to assess compatibility of a plate to the proximal humerus using three-dimensional (3D) printed models. Materials and methods: A total of 120 cases were included, who underwent anteroposterior shoulder radiographs. From these, 30 cases with 3D shoulder computed tomography scans were randomly selected to print 3D model. The lateral angle between the lateral cortex of the humeral shaft and lateral border of the greater tuberosity (GT), neck-shaft angle, and height from the most proximal point of the GT to the angular point were measured. When the plates were applied on the 3D models, the gap from the most proximal point of the GT to the proximal rim of the plate was measured. Results: The mean lateral angle in plain radiographs was 12.9 ± 2.2° and height from the most proximal point of the GT to the angular point was 44.4 ± 4.7 mm. The bending angles of the three plates were 8° and 10°. Height from the proximal rim of the plate to the bending point was 42.4, 42.0 and 43.8 mm. In 98% of cases, the lateral angle of the humerus was larger than all three plates. In 43% of cases, height of the GT was smaller than height of plates. When plates were applied to the 3D model, the mean gap from GT to plate was 4.8 ± 2.8 mm. Conclusions: There was large variation in the lateral angle of the proximal humerus, which was not correlated with the neck-shaft angle. The lateral angle of the humerus was larger than the plates and prone to varus reduction and medial collapse. Level of evidence or clinical relevance: Basic science study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-226
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • 3D printing
  • Compatibility
  • Locking plate
  • Proximal humeral fracture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why locking plates for the proximal humerus do not fit well'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this